“Ugly”, “Toxic”, or “Mommy Issues”: Discussing Red Flags and Green Flags in Short-Term vs. Long-Term Relationships

Authors: Matthew Bitterman, Haille Mark, Emma Fitzgerald, Zoe Gonzalez, Clarissa Covey, Supriya Mandke

Field of Study: Psychology; Political Science

Program Affiliation: Binghamton Human Sexualities Lab

Faculty Mentors: Ann Merriwether, Sean Massey, Melissa Hardesty

Easel: 86

Timeslot: Midday

Abstract: In popular culture, “Red Flags” and “Green Flags” are often used to describe traits that influence a person’s decision to get romantically or sexually involved. Gender schema theory suggests that men and women may frame relationship goals differently. This study examines gender differences in the presence of “Red Flags” and “Green Flags” in long-term compared to short-term relationships in college students. In the current study, participants were asked to describe potential barriers or motives to engage in a romantic or sexual relationship. Researchers hypothesized that there would be gender differences in participants’ descriptions of “Red and Green Flags.” Researchers additionally hypothesize that there will be differences in “Red and Green Flags” between short-term and long-term relationships. Preliminary findings supported the hypotheses, demonstrating gender differences influence relationship potential. This research provides insight into relationship dynamics and what influences people’s decisions to enter or stay in long-term or short-term relationships.